Change is good

Tracey Tokuhama-Espinosa reflects on the benefits of online instruction in Part Five⎮2 min 40 sec read
Change is good

In Part One Tracey Tokuhama-Espinosa reviewed the factors teachers should consider before transitioning classes to online courses, while in Part Two she explored how student attitude and the quality of materials contribute to successful online learning outcomes. In Part Three she demonstrated how communication and good design motivate students to learn, while in Part Four Tracey discussed how to manage the transition to online and the support systems available to teachers and students. To conclude her series, Tracey reflects on the benefits of online instruction in Part Five.


There is a vast amount of literature that points to the potentials, promises and perils of online learning. It is easy to demonstrate that online learning has several important advantages noted in rigorous comparative studies in which it was found that, “students in the online courses reported better understanding of the course structure, better communication with the course staff, watched the video lessons more, and had higher engagement and satisfaction,” (Soffer & Nachmias, 2018, p.534) than the same students in face-to-face classes. 

Answers to educational challenges are never easy as there are multiple confounding variables that must be taken into consideration, not the least of which have to do with the quality of the teacher, the attitudes of the students, the use of instructional design and available tools, the personalisation of the endeavour, the knowledge-base of the actors and the way change is managed by the institution.

The answers to our most frequent questions about online learning are naturally complex as human learning and the brain are complex. All animals learn, but few, including humans, have a science of teaching (Blakemore & Frith, 2005), and humans alone do this in modalities other than being face-to-face. Learning to teach online is not easy because it requires not only (a) knowing how to teach and (b) understanding the tools and strategies available, but it also presumes that teachers have (c) content or domain area knowledge (i.e., the history teacher knows history); and that the teacher has (d) an understanding of the brain and how humans learn best. None of these premises can be taken for granted. This means that to “take your course online,” educators and those requesting this change should offer the right training to fill in any potential gaps in teachers’ general abilities. 

Online is a modality with a wonderful potential to save time (i.e., no more commuting to class), reach more students (i.e., classes are no longer limited to the physically present but can be comprised of global school houses and the ability to include those traditionally excluded from regular classrooms), differentiate (i.e., offer multiple levels of entry points to topics with a wider variety of resources), and personalise learning. This is all contingent, however, on ensuring both teachers and students are ready for the challenge and well-equipped with evidence-based premises before logging on.

Stay tuned for more advice about transitioning into virtual classrooms with Tracey Tokuhama-Espinosa's new podcast, up next. 


Aldrich, H. E. (2016). 'Group Work’ Has Lasting Benefits Beyond K-12. Entrepreneur & Innovation Exchange.

Artlet, C., Baumert, J., Julius-McElvany, N., & Peschar, J. (2003). Learners for Life. Student Approaches to Learning. Results from PISA 2000.

Bazylak, J., & Weiss, P. E. (2017). Online Evolution: Advantages and Challenges of Online Course Components. Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA).

Bechara, A., Damasio, H., & Damasio, A. R. (2000). Emotion, decision making and the orbitofrontal cortex. Cerebral cortex10(3), 295-307.

Blakemore, S. J., & Frith, U. (2005). The learning brain: Lessons for education. Blackwell publishing.

Bowers, J., & Kumar, P. (2015). Students' perceptions of teaching and social presence: A comparative analysis of face-to-face and online learning environments. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies (IJWLTT)10(1), 27-44.

Côté, J. E., & Levine, C. G. (2000). Attitude versus aptitude: Is intelligence or motivation more important for positive higher-educational outcomes?. Journal of Adolescent Research15(1), 58-80.

Crawford-Ferre, H. G., & Wiest, L. R. (2012). Effective online instruction in higher education. Quarterly Review of Distance Education13(1), 11.

Darling-Hammond, L., Rothman, R., & Cookson Jr, P. W. (2017). Expanding high-quality educational options for all students. Learning Policy Institute.

Duckworth, A. L. (2011). The significance of self-control. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences108(7), 2639-2640.

Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Random House.

Ejreaw, A., & Drus, M. (2017). The challenges of massive open online courses (MOOC)–a preliminary review. ICOCI Kuala Lumpur. Univ. Utara Malaysia [Internet], 25-27.

Grison, S., Luke, S. G., Shigeto, A., & Watson, P. D. (2011). Using low-stakes repeated testing can improve student learning: How (some) practice makes perfect.

Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. Routledge.

Hattie, J., & Anderman, E. M. (Eds.). (2013). International guide to student achievement. Routledge.

Hattie, J., & Clarke, S. (2018). Visible Learning: Feedback. Routledge.

He, W., Xu, G., & Kruck, S. E. (2019). Online IS education for the 21st century. Journal of Information Systems Education25(2), 1.

Hodas, N. O., & Lerman, K. (2014). The simple rules of social contagion. Scientific reports4, 4343.

Johnson, E., Rice, S., & Geels, K. (2011). The Contagion of Emotion, Perception, and Goal-directed Behavior through Symbolic Environments. International Journal of Technology, Knowledge & Society7(1).

Keeling, R., & Hersh, R. (2016). We're losing our minds: Rethinking American higher education. Springer.

Mayer, L., von Schmieden, K., Taheri, M., & Meinel, C. (2020). Designing a Synthesis MOOC: Lessons from Frameworks, Experiments and Learner Paths. In Design Thinking Research (pp. 35-47). Springer, Cham.

McCarty, C. (2018). Building student learning through increased teacher self-efficacy in classroom management practices. WCE-201840(11), 25.

McClendon, C., Neugebauer, R. M., & King, A. (2017). Grit, Growth Mindset, and Deliberate Practice in Online Learning. Journal of Instructional Research8, 8-17.

Pytash, K. E., & Ferdig, R. E. (2017). How Real-Virtual-Relationships Impact Learning. Journal of Interactive Learning Research28(4), 309-313.

Salter, S., Douglas, T., & Kember, D. (2017). Comparing face-to-face and asynchronous online communication as mechanisms for critical reflective dialogue. Educational Action Research25(5), 790-805.

Tagg, J. (2012). Why does the faculty resist change?. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning44(1), 6-15.

Tang, X., Wang, M. T., Guo, J., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2019). Building grit: The longitudinal pathways between mindset, commitment, grit, and academic outcomes. Journal of youth and adolescence48(5), 850-863.

Tokuhama-Espinosa, T. & Nelson, A.D. (2019). The origins of bias [infographic]. 

Weinhardt, J. M., & Sitzmann, T. (2019). Revolutionizing training and education? Three questions regarding massive open online courses (MOOCs). Human Resource Management Review29(2), 218-225.

Zimmerman, B. J., Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2017). The role of self-efficacy and related beliefs in self-regulation of learning and performance. Handbook of competence and motivation: Theory and application313.

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Neuroscience Community, please sign in